May 262011

This post is a follow up on my post titled why parallel programming is hard. To demonstrate parallel programming, I present a case study of parallelizing a kernel which computes a histogram. I use Open MP for parallelization (see the reason here). The post first introduces some basic parallel programming concepts and then deep dives into performance optimizations.

Update 5/30/2011: I have written my next post on parallel programming. It discusses the motivation, implementation, and trade-offs of dynamic work scheduling.

Histogram Problem

I am using the histogram kernel because it is very simple and clearly demonstrates some very important concepts in parallel programming: thread spawning, critical sections, atomic operations, barriers, false sharing, and thread join. Here is our problem statement:

Problem: Count the number of times each ASCII character occurs on a page of text.

Input: ASCII text stored as an array of characters.

Output: A histogram with 128 buckets –one for each ascii character– where each entry stores the number of occurrences of the corresponding ascii character on the page.


Single-thread solution

Here is a single-threaded implementation of the histogram kernel:

1: void compute_histogram_st(char *page, int page_size, int *histogram){
2:  for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
3:    char read_character = page[i];
4:    histogram[read_character]++;
5:  }
6: }

This code takes 10.36 seconds to run on my Core2Quad with 4GB of memory. Throughout this tutorial, I set the page size to 10M and executed the loop 100x times to rule out any random effects from the OS. I use the Intel C Compiler version 9.1 with –O3 optimizations.

Finding the parallelism…

Parallelism is relatively obvious in the histogram kernel. We can evenly split the iterations of this loop among threads such that each thread processes only its own portion of the input page. We can use the Open MP parallel for to achieve this (learn about the inside workings of Open MP parallel for here).


1: void compute_histogram_st(char *page, int page_size, int *histogram){
2:  #pragma omp parallel for
3:  for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
4:    char read_character = page[i];
5:    histogram[read_character]++;
6:  }

The above code does not work. Why? Because the increment on line 5 is translated into the following sub-operations:


   1:   R0 = MEMORY[input_character]   2:   R0 = R0 + 1   3:   MEMORY[R1] = R0

When two threads run these operations concurrently, there can be data races. For example, if T0 is executing line 2 when T1 executes line 1 then the histogram bucket will miss an increment. (See this other post for more details)

To prevent threads from accessing shared data concurrently, accesses to shared data are encapsulated inside synchronization primitives like locks. The code protected by a lock is called a critical section . A critical section guarantees mutual exclusion, i.e., if one thread is accessing a critical section then any other thread wanting to execute the same critical section must wait. Today’s processors provide hardware support for running some commonly occurring critical sections speedily. Fortunately, incrementing a single memory location (the code on line 5) is one of those atomic instructions in x86. Open MP can be directed to convert the increment into an atomic instruction using #pragma atomic as follows:

1: void compute_histogram_mt2(char *page, int page_size, int *histogram){
2:   #pragma omp parallel for
3:   for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
4:     char read_character = page[i];
5:     #pragma omp atomic
6:     histogram[read_character]++;
7:   }
8: }

This code produces correct results but it takes 114.89 seconds to run on the four cores which is >10x slower than our singe-thread code. Not a good idea :)

The problem is that the atomic increment (lines 5-6) has a longer latency than the regular non-atomic load +  increment + store operations combined. This offsets the benefit of parallelism. How to reduce such critical sections is a major challenge in parallel programming. In the histogram’s case, we can use reduction. In reduction, each thread first updates a thread-private local histogram and then “reduces” (adds) it to the global histogram only once at the end of the loop. Updates to these local histograms can execute in parallel but additions to the global histogram still require atomic operations. The new code is as follows:

1: void compute_histogram_mt3(char *page,
                                   int page_size,
                                   int *histogram,
                                   int num_buckets){
2:  #pragma omp parallel
3:  {
4:    int local_histogram[111][num_buckets];
5:    int tid = omp_get_thread_num();
6:    #pragma omp for nowait
7:    for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
8:      char read_character = page[i];
9:      local_histogram[tid][read_character]++;
10:   }
11:   for(int i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++){
12:     #pragma omp atomic
13:     histogram[i] += local_histogram[tid][i];
14:   }
15: }

This code runs in 3.8 seconds on my 4-core system, but its speedup still isn’t 4. Why? Because the actual amount of work done by the kernel has increased. Each thread has to not only process the input array but also execute the reduction code in lines 11-14. The fact that this code contains an atomic operation makes it lengthier. On a side note: By default, Open MP always ends a parallel for clause with a barrier, enforcing that no threads can proceed unless all threads have finished their work (more description below). Adding the no wait clause on line 6 removes this restriction as in this example its ok for threads to proceed to the second loop (lines 11-14) without waiting for other threads to finish the first loop (lines 7-10).

Like I pointed out, we should try to reduce the number of atomic adds. The operations need to be atomic only because we are allowing multiple threads to update the global histogram. Instead, we can make one thread in-charge of adding all local histograms to the global histogram. While this approach increases non-parallel code, its benefit may outweigh its cost. Lets try. The code looks as follows:

  void compute_histogram_mt4(char *page,
                                  int page_size,
                                  int *histogram,
                                  int num_buckets){
1:   int num_threads = omp_get_max_threads();
2: #pragma omp parallel
3:  {
4:    __declspec (align(64))  int local_histogram[num_threads+1][num_buckets];
5:    int tid = omp_get_thread_num();

6:    #pragma omp for
7:    for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
8:      char read_character = page[i];
9:      local_histogram[tid][read_character]++;
10:   }
11:   #pragma omp barrier
12:   #pragma omp single
13:   for(int t = 0; t < num_threads; t++){
14:     for(int i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++)
15:       histogram[i] += local_histogram[t][i];
16:   }
17: }

There are three new concepts being introduced in this code. First, the barrier at line 7. The semantics of a barrier dictates that no thread can leave a barrier until all threads have reached the barrier.  In our code, the barrier enforces that the reduction happens only after all threads have finished their work (Note: An explicit barrier isn’t actually needed because OpenMP always inserts one by default at the end of a parallel for; I put it there for explanation purposes). Second. the omp single pragma, which enforces that only one thread is allowed to run the reduction code. Third, the __declspec at line 4, which prevents false sharing among threads. False sharing occurs if two threads need to modify the same cache line concurrently. Cache coherence does not allow that and hence threads’ execution gets serialized. By making arrays cache line aligned, you can avoid false sharing (the solution here is the simplest but not most robust). Hence, the reduction is atomic-free. This code takes 4.42 seconds to execute, which is slower than the previous version.

The speedup does not increase because reduction is purely sequential. Question: Can I parallelize the reduction itself, without inserting atomic operations? The answer is yes. I can parallelize reduction such that different threads are in-charge of reducing different buckets. Since no two threads touch the same buckets, an atomic is not needed. The code is as follows:

   void compute_histogram_mt5(char *page,
                                   int page_size,
                                   int *histogram,
                                   int num_buckets){
1: int num_threads = omp_get_max_threads();
2: #pragma omp parallel
3:  {
4:    int tid = omp_get_thread_num();
5:    __declspec (align(64)) int local_histograms[num_threads+1][128];
7:    #pragma omp for
8:    for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
9:      char read_character = page[i];
10:     local_histograms[tid][read_character]++;
11:  }

12:   #pragma omp for
13:    for(int i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++)
14:      for(int t = 0; t < num_threads; t++){
15:        histogram[i] += local_histograms[t][i];
16:      }
17: }

Now this code runs in 3.60 seconds which is the fastest implementation of the histogram so far. Although not shown here, but I made the histogram array cache line aligned to eliminate any false sharing which may occur among threads during reduction. For this tutorial, I will deem this performance acceptable. My goal was to give the readers flavor of parallel programming. As you can see, parallel program optimization can be an endless loop of trial and error. Moreover, the trade-offs can drastically change if the compiler, the hardware, or the input set changes, often requiring a re-tune of the code.

If you are interested in learning more about parallel programming, stay tuned as I plan to present a more complex case study of parallelizing a branch-and-bound algorithms next week.


A tip on the side: To check if the code is spawning the correct number of threads in Linux (with tcsh) you can do:

strace (program-name) |& grep clone | wc –l

The printed number is the total number of times clone (the Linux system call which creates threads) was called which corresponds with how many threads were spawned.

  154 Responses to “Writing and Optimizing Parallel Programs — A complete example”

  1. This is a reduction, so it’s best expressed with reduction syntax. OpenMP, as far as I remember, has a reduction syntax only for predefined operators. With Ateji PX, you can define your own monoid (binary operator) and use it together with the parallel reduction syntax.

    Call histSum the monoid that takes two histograms and sums them, then the reduction is `histSum for||{ hist(i) | int i: 4 }.

    Read this as “the sum, in parallel, of all hist(i) for i between 0 and 3″. hist(i) computes the i-th histogram and the work in split in 4 blocks.

    There is also an advantage over your suggested implementation: there is no need to wait until all local histograms are computed before starting the computation of the local sum, you can sum a local result as soon as it is ready, and even do the sum in parallel using a binary tree. The parallel sum syntax takes this into account, it makes a difference when there are many blocks.

    • I agree that there is a reduction syntax but I would not use it for this post because I wanted to explain performance optimizations in the reduction phase. Letting OpenMP do the reduction would not have brought out the points I made. IMO, such tools are great for using once you understand whats underneath them but they are a bad choice for teaching (you may enjoy this:

      On a side note, I do not think I could use OpenMP reduction as it only works with single variable reductions (please correct me as my information may be outdated).

      OK. You have got me excited about Ateji PX:) Are you willing to write us all a small introduction to Ateji PX?

  2. I’ve keep reading your article, and I would like so much being able to tryout your code into Objective-C and libdispatch.

  3. Whoa, OpenMP makes it look super easy to code some parallel programs in C: #dataparallel

  4. Your histograms appear to be of 8 bit values. Combining 256-long vectors of integers takes on the order of a microsecond on a single core. So if you’re not getting close to 4x speedup, either your numbers are off, or the bottleneck isn’t the CPU (which is parallel), or you are doing very very little work and repeating it (plus thread creation) very many times. Maybe you’re bottlenecked on the memory bus or disk access or somesuch?

    • Rex,

      Thanks for reading.

      I agree 256-long vectors will be fast and not good for parallelization. Thats not what i had. The input page is of size 10M characters and I ran the loop 100 times to get my numbers. I point it out in the section labeled “single thread”

      • When Rex is talking about “combining 256-long vectors of integers”, he means your reduction loop. It iterates over only num_threads*num_buckets values, which is such a small number that the execution time should be insignificant. And indeed, when I tried out a variation of compute_histogram_mt4 locally, I saw 426924 us spent in the first loop and 278 us spent in the second loop (total of 100 iterations). So it’s hard to blame the second loop for any performance problems. Even if I take the second loop out entirely and write into local_histograms that are never read, compute_histogram_mt4′s first loop is not 4X faster than compute_histogram_st. Bottlenecked on the memory bus seems like a decent guess as to why, given that it’s reading data at about 1.2 GBytes per second.

        btw, nice article. I’d never tried out OpenMP before, and you got me to play with it. It’s much easier than doing everything with pthreads by hand.

        • Scott, Thanks a lot for this post. First, it explains what Rex is getting at. Second, it forces me to peel another layer of the onion.

          First, I highly doubt its memory bandwidth:

          The available bandwidth on Nehalem = 1.33GHz (DDR-3) x 8 bytes x 3 channels = 32 GB/s which is 26x more than 1.2 GB/s. In fact, an even more memory intensive kernel showed linear speedup on this machine (

          Then whats causing it in IMO?

          Its the overhead of parallelizing stuff using Open MP. Here is the data:

          Single Thread: 9.47 secs
          mt4 code, num_threads = 1: 12.74 secs
          mt4 code, num_threads = 4: 3.29 secs
          mt4 code w/o loop-2 @ 4 threads = 3.19 secs.

          So, mt4 loop-1 is indeed showing near-linear speedup except that the baseline with Open MP is 30% slower. Why?

          Open MP introduces this overhead each time you start a parallel region. Since I put the parallel region in the inner loop, it was causing that overhead to be paid again and again which led to a slower speed overall. Lesson: Don’t make Open MP spawn threads in the inner loop.

          I hope this explanation helps. Thanks.

          • Yeah, that explains it, thanks. A little disappointing – one would hope OpenMP would be smart enough to leave the worker threads around for the next block. Maybe there’s something to be said for doing things by hand with pthreads after all… :-/

          • You could try to declare the omp parallel statement outside the function-call.
            Calling ‘parallel’ in an OMP-pragma is only telling to create the threads.
            Even worse, when calling #pragma omp for, without first calling #pragma omp parallel, will cause the for-loop to be executed single-threaded.
            Only make sure you don’t call ‘parallel’ within a ‘parallel region’ (e.g. nested)

            Just make sure you don’t mess up the ‘shared’ and (local) private variables.

            Within the parallel region the threads will stay dormant when not in use.

  5. So your speed-up for going 4 way parallel is to go from 3.83 seconds single-threaded to 3.60 on four threads? Hardly worth the effort. You’ve missed that your workload appears to be memory-subsystem bound, and so you’ll gain essentially no benefit from parallelism.

    • Hi Paul,

      Excellent catch. Actually I had written the wrong number for single thread. The typo has been fixed. The actual time for single thread was closer to 10 seconds hence the speedup is much higher than it initially looked.

      I would point out that the histogram is not memory bound at all. Its a very regular workload which does not saturate memory bandwidth. It does go uneasy on cache but then the hardware prefetcher is likely to do a great job of prefetching this array so the cache misses are very few. I ran this on a simulator to verify the above.

      Thanks again.

      • 10.36 to 3.60 is substantially better. I’m still curious as to the last missing 4 seconds of time – I don’t see four seconds of work in the histogram reduction, so something is still throttling the computation. Some of it should be overhead from OpenMP thread launches, etc, but a second per core of such overhead is still too high.

  6. Unless I’m missing something (which is possible), I think the “reduction” step in your last example has a bug.

    12: #pragma omp for
    13: for(int i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++)
    14: for(int t = 0; t < num_threads; t++){
    15: histogram[i] += local_histograms[tid][i]; //< Should be 't', not 'tid'
    16: }

    • Stuart. I fixed the typo. It wasn’t a bug in my C file. I copy pasted code around while trying to get it to post in wordpress and copied the code from snippet #2. You are most welcome to try it out., I would be very interested in seeing the results on a different machine.

  7. All that mental work.. all that time spent on tweaking… to allow an improvement of single core to multi core, to go from 3.8 seconds, to 3.6 seconds?!?!!?

    I think this PARTICULAR issue, would be better meta-optimized as, “just use single core, and leave the other cores to do more useful stuff for the user of the machine” !!

    To abuse Knuth(?), “one of the greatest programming evils, is premature optimization”.
    This would be one of those evil times.

    • Philip. The speedup is about 3x so its definitely worth the effort. There was typo that I fixed.

      In general, there are very few kernels where parallelism is so hopeless. One example is the following averaging filter.

      for (int i = 9; i < N; i++){
      A[i] = (A[i] + A[i-1])/2;

      • I am with the impression that the previous 2-liner has an inconsistency: by my understanding of what averaging is, “A[i]=” should be modified to “A[i-1]=” to avoid iterative corruptions.

        Also, I recommend in the original article to spot the number 128 in the last reference of __declspec and replace it with “num_buckets”, for clarity reasons.

        Interesting read, btw. If the example is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, we could base some training material & comments on it.

      • ST version:
        <type> A[N];
        for (int i = 9; i < N; i++){
        A[i] = (A[i] + A[i - 1]) / 2;

        MT version:
        <type> A_buf[N], B_buf[N];
        <type> (*A)[] = &A_buf, (*B)[] = &B_buf;
        for (int i = 9; i < N; i++) {
        (*B)[i] = ((*A)[i] + (*A)[i - 1]) / 2;
        (*tmp)[] = A;
        A = B;
        B = tmp;

        And suddenly you can (hopefully) see how to thread it.

  8. I am always interested in learning about parallel programming but I confess that I don’t understand why the iterative approaches taken here are proposed. Why, if the goal is to parallel-ize this problem isn’t the approach made parallel in the first place?

    My experience with parallel programming is in higher-level languages than this (Java / .NET / SQL) but it seems to me that conceptually, if you know the ideal number of threads desired, correctly splitting the problems (count the characters, reduce the results) across the threads should give ideal performance.

    (Again, I don’t know the language you’re using but in pseudocode:)

    -Prepare a 2-D array for the histogram results, one row per thread, one column per character.
    -Split the input across the target number of threads, assign each thread a range of the input, and a row in the results array.
    -Wait for each thread to finish.
    -Create an array for the totals, one position per character.
    -Split the results array by columns, assign each thread a set of columns to sum up and store in the totals array.
    -Wait for each thread to finish.

    At the end you have the same results, and no threads were waiting on shared memory at all.

    I recognize that some of the code you’re sharing has ‘built in’ parallelism but my experience so far in a corporate setting with procedural programmers is that you have to approach the problem in a parallel way in the first place or it never works out. You have to begin with a gameplan to keep every thread distinct as long as possible with their own unique work to do. I think your readers would be better served with an explanation of the thought process that breaks a problem across threads from the get-go, instead of trying to maintain the ‘look’ of a procedural ST loop.

    • Corey, I agree that the parallelism algorithm you propose should come to an experienced parallel programmer naturally. However, there are very few such people out there.

      The target audience for this post are people who do not have such experience. I felt that its important to show a bridge between serial and parallel code for them to be able to understand the challenges. I chose the histogram because it takes very little time to change it from serial to parallel and most of the work is in optimizing the parallel work — which by the way will still be required even if we take you approach. Your code will run into false sharing (and you will have to make the output array cache line aligned)

      Thanks for reading and I look forward to your comments.

    • Just wanted to join in here and add a ‘lesson’ –
      When designing a parallel algorithm you are best to choose a divide & conquer functional approach. Should you find a functional way to perform the steps of reduce, process reduced and merge, the less you will be writing locks, semaphores and synchro objects which can create bottlenecks (if not outright defects and deadlocks) difficult to detect (and worse – difficult to predict).
      [BTW - when I say functional, I simply mean the functional style, not a particular language/platform. Though I have to say that writing this algorithm in lisp would be more natural than in C/C++, but that's just this algorithm.]
      Of course – this is not always the correct paradigm and so on, but the given example of a histogram — as well as many other text processing algorithms — is a classic example for a divide & conquer algorithm.
      I would suggest that anyone who is investing time in _understanding_ parallel programming to do some research in functional programming which makes heavy usage of divide & conquer algorithms. You may end up writing very different code for serial mode and for parallel mode, but it will be using the best strategy for each case.

  9. I’m unfamiliar with Open MP (I do my own threading in VC++), but I’d like to point something out: It seems to me that the threaded compute_histogram_st() example would work flawlessly on all x86 hardware in spite of the author’s assertions.

    I’ve been programming x86 assembler for some 15 years and from the statements made I can tell the author doesn’t know x86 assembler as well as he should. According to Intel documentation, the INCrement instruction is atomic — it has no load/increment/save phases that the programmer (or even the CPU) can interrupt and is therefore not vulnerable to being corrupted.. at all.

    Fortunately for us, Intel made life easier for programmers of its architecture by guaranteeing that any single instruction operates atomically, so a more complex example than a histogram might have illustrated the author’s point more accurately by manually reading the value, modifying it in a 2-step operation, and writing it again. The fundamental threading principals are still accurate, but that one example just happens to be a special case and will work perfectly (when the #pragma is removed).

    To my mind the only performance issue is that each of the CPUs will be fighting for access to the cache line containing the histogram output. However, the overhead of spinlocks or critical sections can also be severe (as the author demonstrated). The best solution is as the author described: Individual threads using their own cache-aligned storage and merging their results at the end.

  10. Very cool article. Minor question: is there a reason you did num_threads+1 for the size of the tid array?

    • foon, excellent question. dead on target:) I was hoping someone asks me that.

      I left the description out of the article to keep it simple. The reason: I used a power-of-2 number of threads, i.e., 4. A problem with power of two array sizes and number of threads is that multiple threads can map to the same cache or memory bank and start contending for cache banks and memory banks. By making it a non power of two, you can avoid such unexpected behavior.


      • Interesting. Is that purely a performance issue (i.e. thread A gets mapped to cache[X], thread B gets mapped to same spot, meaning next time A runs, it has to flush the cache and pull from memory so things run slower the same way something compiled with some optimizations may run slower because of the relative slowness of memory) or is there also potential correctness issues (i.e. thread A gets mapped to cache[X], writes to something there, B gets mapped to cache[X], writes there and now A’s values are incorrect). I would hope just the former. If I didn’t know the number of threads a priori, would I have to do some grungy math (I guess numthreads & 1 + 1 would work for numthreads > 1) to force it not to be a power of 2?

        (And just to check, did you mean cache in the L1/L2/LN sense or some other sense?)

        • Yes. Purely performance. I would use some match to make it the next non power of 2. I generally use static sizes but didn’t do it for the tutorial to not confuse people.

          I meant caches in L1/L2 sense.

  11. A minor issue: there is no need for #pragma omp atomic in the _mt4 version since the additions are in a #pragma omp single region.

  12. The true problem with parallel programing are the tools available.

    I think C/C++ is a great language for ST, but adding OpenMP just does not cut it.
    New programming languages are missing the code base, and head count.

    C++0x added threading support is adding a functional threading paradigm to an object oriented language. I would say pthreads are of about the same value.

    Threading support is ADDED instead of integrated, and I have to come to the conclusion that I will have to come up with my own C/C++ extension.

    I believe that once threading is integral to C/C++ it will solve a lot of existing problems in MT code.

    Please check out for my first approach.

  13. It seems like OpenMP runs very well. I’m surprised, since I thought the large chunk of time to clone a process would outweigh benefits of small bits of code chunks. Perhaps it’s dependent on the size of the dataset, as larger amounts of data would allow each row to do more, take longer and outweigh the clone cost.
    I wondered if there was some way to have an even lighter weight thread that could be initialized in about 1/6 to 1/4th the time of a clone, allowing it to be used with smaller code chunks.
    Have you any experience or advice on the smallest code snippets before the clone overhead becomes burdensome, or is that just a matter of trial and error?

    • Linda, the clone overhead is high and can be prohibitive if individual chunks are small. I did some experiments in 2007 on Fedora Core III with Dual Xeons and found that a new thread costs about 10,000 cycles. Thus a new thread can only be justified if it can off load at least 10K cycles worth of work from the current threads. The 10K number is machine and OS dependent so you will have to experiment with your platform.

      BTW, a common approach to practically eliminating the clone overhead is to use a pre-allocated thread pool. You can create threads once at the beginning of the program and keep them around in the thread-pool until the program finishes.

  14. In critical sections where the code needs to run as fast as possible, it is also possible to use the processor functions of the chip to parallelize even the single threaded portion of the code. For example in your earlier example where the code finishes the parellel processing and then adds up the historgram values using a single thread, you can use MMX/SSE/SSE2. By reading in multiple values (integers) at the same time (single instruction) and perform multiple adds in a single instruction and writing the values back you get high parallelism with limited context/memory delays.

    If done correctly can improve execution time dramatically.

    • Peter, thanks for reading. I am sorry for my late response. Thats a great point and I 100% agree. In fact, I SIMD is one of those topics I want to raise awareness about among programmers. However, for this article, I disabled auto-vectorization of the loop by Intel C Compiler to ensure it doesn’t use SSE. The only reason I didn’t so is to not add another dimension to this article. SIMD is a different topic and I will cover it in a post.

      Btw, just for sanity checking, SSE turns out to be about 5x faster for me. Do you see similar numbers?

      I will remember to notify you when I write the SIMD article.


      • Yes, often it is in the range of 5 to 6 times, however, depending on how I pack the data, I can achieve much higher results. For example I can add 8 16 bit numbers or 16 8 bit numbers and as long as your histogram is guaranteed to not exceed 65535 letters per bucket you can get much higher performance. Of course that depends on what you are trying to build and what rules/assumptions you can make use of.

  15. [...] Writing and Optimizing Parallel Programs — A complete example (tags: programming toread parallel computerscience) [...]

  16. Congrats, as a programmer you just wrote and demonstrated what took a professor of mine a few weeks to describe.

    Parallel programming is very tough Race conditions, dependencies, hardware changes, programmer error, legacy code, atomic actions, no debugging support, and critical sections [btw i'm sure i'm missing some], all make it very difficult to properly write parallel applications as well as slowing down your application which you are trying to make faster.

    This demo just clearly states that something that looks so simple; when trying to re-write it for parallel execution; makes it difficult to program and makes it hard to find out where and why we have to do certain actions (like the race condition that must be fixed by an atomic operation).

    Congrats for a well thought-out example and thanks for the read.

    – Rob

    • Hi Rob,

      Thank you for reading. Your comments are indeed very encouraging. I am currently working on a another tutorial explaining task parallelism using a simple example. I hope you will enjoy that. Stay in touch.


  17. The code is not entirely correct. First of all, C/C++ do not guarantee that char is unsigned. Therefore, it should be unsigned char at all times.

    Furthermore, I don’t get it why the compiler would make local_histograms a shared object among threads. It is declared inside the parallel region and as such, each thread should have its own. Maybe icc 9.1 is broken in this part.

    Finally, local_histograms should be zeroed, otherwise it is incorrect.

    By slight modifications and using newer compilers (gcc 4.4.5 and intel 12.1) I get decent speedups with the following (I’m sorry for the C++, but it was faster to write it):

    inline void compute_histogram_mt(char* page, const std::size_t page_size, int* histogram)
    unsigned int nth = omp_get_max_threads();
    std::vector<std::vector*> lhistograms(nth, static_cast<std::vector*>(0));

    #pragma omp parallel default(none) shared(page, histogram, lhistograms, nth)
    const std::size_t N = 256;
    std::vector lh(N, 0);
    lhistograms[omp_get_thread_num()] = &lh;

    // compute local histogram
    #pragma omp for
    for (std::size_t i=0; i<page_size; ++i) {
    unsigned char idx = page[i];

    // aggregate local histograms to global
    #pragma omp for nowait
    for (std::size_t i=0; i<N; ++i) {
    for (std::size_t j=0; j<nth; ++j) {
    histogram[i] += (*lhistograms[j])[i];
    } // omp parallel

    Declaring the local histogram truly local and then sharing its address among the threads helps a big time, especially if the OpenMP implementation supports thread local heap allocators.

    Now the only problem one will encounter is that there will not be enough parallelism in the aggregation loop as it can only go up to 256 threads. It can be solved by using a task-parallel paradigm though throughout the code.

    • The code assumes that all values in char *page are 0 to 127 otherwise there is a buffer overflow regardless of signed or unsigned.

      I don’t get how “int local_histograms[num_threads+1][128];” compiles unless this is something to do with Open MP.

      You cough the other two but missed this one:
      #pragma omp for
      for(int i = tid; i < num_buckets; i +=num_threads)
      for(int t = 0; t < num_threads; t++)
      histogram[i] += local_histograms[t][i];

      **** Note to all coders DO NOT DO THIS ****
      for (...) {
      if (...) {
      ... someFunction(...) {

      It makes you lose track of braces just look at compute_histogram_st and compute_histogram_mt5 are missing “}” at the end.

  18. [...] the different buckets on the histogram in parallel. Histogram parallelization is described here:…. Many scientific kernels also have reduction. Any time you can do a reduction using multiple [...]

  19. [...] I can't stop thinking about is a parallel histogram. I did do some analysis of it here:… . Once you get past the histogram 9which can consume months), you can look at some task-parallel [...]

  20. [...] You might remember I wrote previously about Aater Suleman’s blog post that kick started an online debate about why parallel programming is so hard. He’s now followed it up with a step-by-step tutorial on parallelising a program. [...]

  21. I wonder – what are you timing here, and just how fast is that cpu?

    I have what is now quite an old laptop that has a core-duo T7300 @ 2.0Ghz, and as far as I can tell they don’t make core2-quad’s that slow – the cpu is 4 years old.

    On this machine: a serial single-threaded Java implementation (openjdk6 – 32 bit), 256 entry histogram, 10x1024x1024 bytes of random 8-bit data, and totalling up 100 runs takes under 2.5 seconds.

    (For comparison, a more up-to-date i7-980 desktop w/ the oracle jvm 64-bit takes only 0.72s)

    This is only timing the histogram generation – the data is in memory already. Whether I do a few ‘warm up’ iterations outside of the timing first – to prime the hotspot compiler – seems to make no noticeable difference.

    But maybe you’re timing more/something else.

    The code in all it’s complexity:

    static void genhistogram(byte [] data, int [] histogram) {
    for (int i=0;i<data.length;i++) {
    histogram[data[i] & 0xff] += 1;

    Incidentally, any attempts at optimisation (e.g. reading 4 bytes at once using an int, array and then shifting it out) slows it down on intel hardware, although I can get another 25% performance out of a phenomii by doing that.

    Also, for such a relatively big yet simple problem you should get almost exactly 1:1 scaling with the number of cores until you hit memory bandwidth issues – which is essentially impossible when reading bytes at a time. The problem is big enough that thread overhead should be minuscule, and simple enough that dividing it evenly is trivial. The final reduction is so small as to be totally insignificant.

  22. Aater i was wondering if you would be kind enough to help me turn a secvential program into a parallel one. C with OpenMP, i’m having trouble in making it work corectly. I’m new to parallel programming,even though it’s a simple program i can’t figure it out. Contact me by e-mail if you can be of some help,thank you.Razvan

  23. [...] … I was unaware … that a major challenge in multi-threaded programming lies in optimizing parallel programs not just getting them to run. His analysis is insightful and the case study is very enlightening if [...]

  24. Greate pieces. Keep writing such kind of information on your site.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hey there, You’ve done an excellent job. I will definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I’m sure they’ll be benefited from this website.

  25. What a stuff of un-ambiguity and preswrveness of precious familiarity about
    unpredicted feelings.

  26. Бързи заеми и всички видове бързи кредити
    Сайт за бързи заеми и потребителски
    кредити в България
    Пари назаем до 24 часа с бърз кредит
    В този уеб сайт ще намерите списък на фирми предлагащи бърз заем, в които получавате парите до 24 часа, предложения
    за бърз потребителски кредит над 399 лв, както
    и актуални промоции , списък
    с офисите на компаниите по градове, микрокредити за малкия бизнес, удобен филтър за бързо намиране на най-добрата
    оферта, калкулатор, услуги
    с изцяло онлайн процес за кандидатстване и взимане на парите,
    полезна информация.

    Also visit my webpage; бърз и лесен кредит

  27. Greetings! Very useful advice in this particular article!
    It’s the little changes which will make the largest changes.

    Many thanks for sharing!

  28. Greetings from Florida! I’m bored to death at work so I
    decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break.
    I love the knowledge you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m shocked at how fast your blog loaded on my cell phone ..
    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, awesome blog!

  29. Excellent blog here! Also your website loads up fast!
    What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to
    your host? I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as
    yours lol

  30. Основно супер бързи финансиране сме изключително
    pricy . Вие внесено разклоняване над годишен
    процент темпо които могат да бъдат доста сто процент .
    Като пример може да върна 20 лева заряд до ползване 100.00 лева за две две или
    три седмици . The купувач федерацията
    на България има някои хубави приятни
    изчисления оценка изключително
    бързо лични заеми по опции .

    се установи, че бихте заплащане
    на Проценти с бърз банков
    кредит , но разходи на върха на
    Процент няма да нечувано

    Have a look at my web site; бърз кредит само срещу лична карта

  31. Red Wings Black all nhl jerseys

  32. Thankfulness to my father who shared with me on the topic of ths webpage, this webpage is genuinely awesome.

  33. Quality information: clearly presented with carefully crafted replies.

    Thank you for taking the time to put this out there.

  34. First off I want to say superb blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to ask if
    you do not mind. I was curious to know how you center yourself and clear your thoughts prior to writing.
    I have had trouble clearing my mind in getting my ideas out there.
    I do enjoy writing however it just seems like
    the first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or tips?

  35. Hi my loved one! I want to say that this article is awesome, great written and come with almost all significant infos.
    I would like to peer more posts like this .

  36. I’ve been surfing on-line more than 3 hours nowadays, yet I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours.
    It is beautiful worth enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers made excellent content as you did, the
    net will probably be much more useful than ever before.

  37. You have made some decent points there. I looked on the
    net to find out more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this website.

  38. Hi there, I enjoy reading all of your post.
    I lioke tto write a little comment to support you.

  39. This piece of writing will assist the internet users for setting
    up new website or even a blog from stwrt to end.

    Feel free to surf to my web page; carpet cleaning tampa 33614

  40. They incorporated their own style with that of the Western to create their own streetwear mark.
    Tiara and head pieces can be very costly and may never be used again. Anthrop is
    the root word tto indicate mankind in general.

  41. Good way of describing, and nice paragraph to obtain data about my presentation focus, which i am going to deliver in college.

  42. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is required to get set
    up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain. Any suggestions or
    advice would be greatly appreciated. Appreciate it

  43. Know that you are not only growing great organic plants and saving money for yourself, but you are also contributing to the well-being of the future.
    They can give step-by-step planting instructions, such as: plant positioning;
    how much sun; and seasonal planting times. If you have a vegetable garden that includes growing cabbage and tomatoes, you can shred the tough stems in the garden shredder
    so they decompose quicker than normal.

    My weblog – site

  44. I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you design this website yourself oor
    ddid you hkre someone to do itt for you? Plz respond as I’m looking to create
    mmy owwn blog and would like tto know where u got this from.

  45. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into
    starting my own blog and was curious what all is needed to get
    set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% positive.

    Any suggestions or advice would be greatly
    appreciated. Thanks

    my site; drive traffic

  46. Hi, I do think this is an excellent website. I stumbledupon itt ;) I wikl
    revvisit yeet again since I bookk marked it. Money and frewedom
    iis the greatest way to change, may yyou be rrich and continue to
    guide others.

  47. Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I’d figured I’d ask.

    Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa?
    My blog goes over a lot of the same topics as yours and
    I feel we could greatly benefit from each
    other. If you happen to be interested feel free to send me an email.
    I look forward to hearing from you! Excellent blog by the way!

  48. We utilised our survey bypasser to get this Frontline Commando D-Day Hack and we give
    to down load no cost on our net website. The Frontline Commando D-Day Hack cheat was an special patch to check out
    and we realized it to be 87% productive in our testing.

  49. always i used to read smaller articles which as well clear
    their motive, and that is alkso happening with this piece oof
    writing which I am reading at this place.

  50. Amazing! Its truly remarkable paragraph, I have got much clear idea on the topic of from this article.

  51. I am really enjoying the theme/design of your site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility issues? A handful of my blog visitors have complained about my blog not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any advice to help fix this problem?

  52. Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice even as you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I were tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered brilliant clear concept

  53. Hi Dear, are you actually visiting this site daily, if so after that you will without doubt obtain fastidious know-how.

  54. It’s going to be end of mine day, except before ending I am
    reading this great post to improve my know-how.

  55. Hi there, i read your bog occasionally and i own a similar onne and i
    was just wpndering if you get a lot of spam
    remarks? If so how do yoou prevent it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support iis
    very much appreciated.

  56. That is a good tip especially to those new to the blogosphere.

    Simple but very precise info… Thank you for sharing this one.
    A must read post!

  57. It’s awesome for me to have a web site, which is good in support of my experience.
    thanks admin

  58. Fantastic post however I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic?
    I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a
    little bit more. Many thanks!

  59. This is really fascinating, You are an excessively professional blogger. I have joined your feed and sit up for in quest of extra of your excellent post. Additionally, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks

  60. I like the helpful information you provide on your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and take a look at again here regularly. I am moderately sure I’ll be told many new stuff proper right here! Good luck for the next!

  61. Very good post! We are linking to this great content on our website. Keep up the great writing.

  62. Spot on with this write-up, I truly feel this web site needs much more attention. I’ll probably be back again to read through more, thanks for the information!

  63. I go to see day-to-day some websites and blogs to read articles or reviews, except this web site gives feature based posts.

  64. always i used to read smaller articles or reviews which as well clear their motive, and that is also happening with this paragraph which I am reading at this time.

  65. Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon every day. It’s always useful to read content from other writers and practice something from their websites.

  66. Definitely imagine that that you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the internet the simplest thing to keep in mind of. I say to you, I certainly get irked whilst other folks consider issues that they plainly do not recognise about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as neatly as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , folks can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  67. It’s enormous that you are getting thoughts from this piece of writing as well as from our dialogue made at this time.

  68. Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this site, as i wish for enjoyment, since this this website conations actually nice funny information too.

  69. It’s in fact very complicated in this active life to listen news on Television, so I simply use the web for that purpose, and obtain the latest information.

  70. Thanks for finally writing about >Writing and Optimizing Parallel Programs <Loved it!

  71. You ought to know the level of material you will be using to enable you to evaluate the type of buttonholes, threads and appropriate materials designed for your new
    sewing machine. First apply little oil, in support of if you find that the equipment still hangs
    up, in the event you give a bit more oil. The built in memory lets you store as much as 20 characters or patterns.

  72. On the other side, in the event you understand beat making well, you will not
    have got problems with that program. If you have always loved listening to music so you
    believe you’ve got the ear to create good quality
    beats, then this could be the industry that you’re going to prefer to get into.
    Ideally you want to produce a drum beat maker download containing 4-8 measures.

  73. Healing’s Dragon…

    to find issues to further improve my site!I suppose its ok to create usage of a handful of of your ideas!!…

  74. i want the code for reader writer problem using openmp concept

  75. Excellent post. I was checking constantly this weblog and I am impressed!
    Extremely helpful info specifically the last phase :
    ) I handle such information much. I used to
    be looking for this particular info for a long time.
    Thanks and good luck.

  76. If you are going for best contents like myself, simply pay a quick visit this web site every
    day since it presents feature contents, thanks

  77. I am in fact happy to glance at this blog posts which includes plenty of valuable facts, thanks for providing these statistics.

  78. I am trying to implement this piece of code to one of my codes. The snippet of is a follows:

    #pragma omp parallel //shared(frame, f_end, chain) private(f, dt, d)
    int tid = omp_get_thread_num();
    __declspec(align(64))double p_acfRv[num_threads + 1][corr_length + 2];
    // memset(p_acfRv, 0, sizeof(double) * (corr_length + 2));

    #pragma omp for
    for(f = frame; f >= f_end; f--) {
    dt = abs(frame - f);
    for(d = 0; d < DIM; d++)
    p_acfRv[tid][dt] += (Rv[f][chain][d] * Rv[frame][chain][d]);

    #pragma omp for
    for(f = frame; f >= f_end; f--) {
    dt = abs(frame - f);
    for(int t = 0; t < num_threads; t++) {
    acfRv[dt] += p_acfRv[t][dt];

    Now, when I try to compile the code, it shows the following error:
    error: expected ‘;’ before ‘double’
    error ‘p_acfRv’ undeclared (first use in this function)

    I donot understand how to get rid of this. I am new to the openmp world. If possible, please suggest the possible solution.

  79. Hi, I am implementing Motion Estimation Algorithm in OpenMP -C language, while doing it i am unable to parallel task.I complete algorithm sequentially,but unable to parallel it.
    Please help me,its my BE project.

  80. You are getting poor parallel performance because you don’t understand false sharing and how the omp atomic is working. You need to understand how variable are local to a thread: you don’t need a 2d array of local_histogram, each thread already has its own version. Adding these versions is the whole point of the omp atomic construct. You will get proper performance with:

    void compute_histogram_myversion(char *page,
    int page_size,
    int *histogram,
    int num_buckets){
    #pragma omp parallel
    int local_histogram[num_buckets];
    #pragma omp for nowait
    for(int i = 0; i < page_size; i++){
    char read_character = page[i];
    for(int i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++){
    #pragma omp atomic
    histogram[i] += local_histogram[i];

  81. What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found
    It positively useeful and it has helped me out loads.

    I am hoping to contribute & help other users like its aided me.
    Great job.

    Feel feee to surf to myy web blog: Ducklife 4 Hacked

  82. Flew from Oslo things to do in norway in march;, Tromso
    in the Arctic Circle and it was non-quit excellent views beneath:
    forests, mountains and lakes.

  83. M. Testino, la Joie de Vivre – Galería de fotografías de celebridades de este fotógrafo experto en moda.

  84. Destaca por sus imágenes cinematográficas, que han influido el mundo de la moda por su realismo y emoción.

  85. Do way with thee have to arrange a DMV lkne or lose time in traffic ticket lawyer NYC court;
    hire us rather.

  86. Y me he informado, y si eres de Barna está el IEFC(institut d’estudis fotografics de Catalunya) que es como una carrera,
    tengo muy claro que la voy a cursar.

  87. Si algo he aprendido de la fotografía de bodas es que mi trabajo no vale tanto ahora como lo que valdrá cuanto más tiempo pase.

  88. Sueño con efectuar reportajes de Bodas elegantes y diferentes en Málaga, Antequera,
    , Cádiz, Berlín, Londres, París donde tu me solicites.

  89. 骑士服务端天上碑服务端美丽世界服务端科洛斯服务端石器时代服务端完美世界服务端烈焰服务端洛汗服务端新魔界服务端绝对女神私服务端征服服务端传说45服务端天之炼狱服务端天堂II私服务端墨香私服务端私服开区服务(网络游戏私服开服制作)&服务器及空间租用&服务端销售传奇广告代理-官方网站http://www.e7if.com客服咨询QQ49333685(企鹅扣扣)Email:49333685@qq.comwww.e7if.com免费版本下载(已修复不能下载问题):传奇开sf

  90. Como gran novedad asimismo está el viaje a la capital de España (incluido en el
    coste del viaje) para la realización del módulo de Moda & Beauty, impartido por Luís Malibrán en las instalaciones de EFTI , fruto
    del último acuerdo cerrado entre Fotografía Desde Cero y la reputada escuela internacional de fotografía.

  91. Three or more. Desire the most effective for your body don’t be happy with everything a smaller amount. Do not place something inside or even on your own system which you probably would not would like children to accomplish.

  92. The meals law enforcement will tell you what as well as more to consume however will tell you this, by eating virtually any foodstuff in moderation along with ample variety you will end up the better correctly.

  93. It’s in fact very complicated in this active life to listen news on Television, so I simply use the web for that purpose, and obtain the latest information.

    - See more at:

  94. Será tu dinero mejor invertido y de ahí que debes asegurarte de escoger a
    un buen profesional que te inspire confianza y calma y con el que en suma,
    te quede un recuerdo precioso para toda la vida de tu reportaje de boda.

  95. Sehr viele Patienten haben den Wunsch, über den Tod zu sprechen und das eigene
    Leben zu Ende zu denken.

  96. Remarkable things here. I’m very happy to see your post.
    Thanks a lot and I am taking a look ahead to contact
    you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

  97. Reportajes de acontecimientos con la experiencia al ser Distribuidor homologado de Viajes El Corte Ingles
    y fotógrafo oficial del Club Deportivo Huelva Baloncesto.

  98. Vamos mucho más allá que solo hacer fotos de bodas y aportamos
    una experiencia con todos los cuidados y todos los mimos que se merece esta clase de fotografía.

  99. Hi, I check your blog named “Writing and Optimizing Parallel Programs — A complete example | Future Chips” like every week.
    import cars

  100. Esta técnica parece ser fácil, mas requer muito jogo de
    cintura por parte do homem.

  101. Meats egg-white has the ability to decrease pores’ size, while egg yolk
    functions as a natural moisturizer.

    Feel free to surf to my weblog: best face wash for acne
    prone skin (Kristie)

  102. Very good info. Lucky me I found your website by accident (stumbleupon).
    I have book marked it for later!

    Colyer Law Group PC
    161 North Clark Street #4700
    chicago il real estate lawyers [Inge], Illinois 60601
    (312) 922-5152

  103. Have you considered becoming a web online marketer however
    believe you require a lots of money? Well, to be entirely truthful with you, nothing could be even more from the reality.
    There are numerous ways to market for low or complimentary costs.
    Some brand-new online marketers believe they require a few thousand dollars a
    month to pour into advertising until they learn other opportunities.
    We are in a time period that you can reach 50 billion people with a click of button on the Web.
    You can market on web sites, send out emails,
    social networking websites, and so far more.Perhaps
    just as crucial, they left me (and all those other prospective
    entrants) with the impression that they were a chaotic,
    improperly run business.So then exactly what’s the problem?
    The problem is that you like so numerous others new to Online
    marketing agency illinois (Tresa), are simply failing to understand the significance
    of Search Engine Optimization. Sure there are millions of prospective
    brand-new consumers or clients out there online. But at the exact same time you have actually failed
    to appropriately take into consideration level of competition you’re up versus.So if you desire a best example
    of what business utilize viral marketing, look them up on youtube or simply log into your facebook.
    Chances are you have actually seen them being
    passed around from close friend to close friend on Facebook, Twitter
    and even through your e-mail.The author of the post went on to highlight a
    “Want a complimentary roofing?” advertising sign published by a roofing company.
    Chances are, once the roofing contractor has the unwary homeowner in his clutches that “totally free” roofing is going to end up costing
    a pretty cent. Driving lesson number two, to steal another overused maxim,
    “There is no complimentary lunch”. or roof as the case may be.No doubt
    its only a one liner to put a title for the short article.
    However do invest a minimum of 25 % to 50 % of your
    time in creating a great impact title for the post.
    Yes its that long for you to think your post over and over once again and develop the best you can think of.
    internet marketing Do spend at least 30 to 15 minutes for the title if you spend 1 hour (not that this is best) to write
    a post.Now you probably see where this is going.
    Whether the house owner’s roofing system actually has sustained damage is
    a moot point. The roofing rip-off artist is going to say that it has
    then continue to sock the property owner with a big costs for repair works he didn’t even require,
    or worse, that aren’t even in fact performed.You
    can now begin to develop a strategy of action to get a step up on them
    once you know everything about them. You understand their negatives and pluses.

    Whether you promote on our website, in radio, print
    or tv, you can now make use of that details in your marketing project.

  104. I know this web site presents quality depending content and other material,
    is there any other web site which presents these stuff in quality?

    Breslan Law
    1127 Plainfield Rd
    joliet divorce lawyer (Cleveland),
    IL 60435
    (815) 726-7950

  105. When some one searches for his necessary thing, so he/she desires to be
    available that marketing terre haute in detail, so that thing is maintained over here.

  106. Ladies began to collect earrings and with the amount
    of styles supplied the alternatives have been definitely almost countless.

    my blog – little gold heart necklace (Leoma)

  107. You actually make it seem really easy with your presentation however I
    find this matter to be actually one thing that I think I
    would by no means understand. It sort of feels too complicated and extremely large for me.
    I am looking ahead on your subsequent publish,
    I’ll attempt to get the hang of it!

    My weblog How to get a real estate license in GA (Nestor)

  108. I really like what you guys tend to be up too. Such clever work and exposure!
    Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to blogroll.

  109. Wonderful blog! Do you have any suggestions for aspiring writers?
    I’m planning to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go
    for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m totally overwhelmed
    .. Any recommendations? Thanks a lot!

  110. Appreciation to my father who told me regarding this webpage, this weblog is
    really awesome.

    my website … interim management consultants

  111. You see for a long period of time there has been an on going struggle and a fiercely contested fight between what I call tattoo traditionalists and the newer tattoo
    artists. This is truly a reflection or just like the age old power battle that
    teenagers typically go through as they attempt to form their own identity and different themselves from their moms and dads.Assess
    your home’s curb appeal and make some improvements. Your
    houses must be attractive enough that house hunters would think it is worth purchasing.
    Do not go for an average appearance. Put in the very best devices
    and brighten your residence. The point is to make your residence stand
    out. And the best you can do is to highlight the very best locations of your
    house.In many cases, the
    ad sales rep will certainly be anxious to inform you the specials they have offered.
    Ask if they don’t provide. You may feel unpleasant, but it’s
    OKAY to request a price cut. That’s how ad agencies get great prices for their clients.Mobile
    phone are quick ending up being a requirement instead of a luxury.
    A big bulk of the population over the age of 15 has one and most children old enough to have pals think they require one.
    The cellular phone market has experienced a sensational
    growth, you have an item that is changed in less than a year
    in many cases, and with an updated model most of the time.
    This indicates that in the past quite longer,
    the audience of anybody marketing with mobile phone will realistically
    be the majority of the world wide population.The last principle is basically the very same as ppc advertising (PPC), except you are the Supplier of the advertisement.
    Not some huge business. So the dashboard comes pre-loaded with lots of
    internet sites that want you to promote their product (in addition to
    pre made text and banner ads – all routed through your supplier ID).
    Payouts can be over $102.00 conversion and/or repeating commissions.No doubt its only a one
    liner to put a title for the short article. However do spend at least 25 % to 50 % of your time in developing a good impact title for the article.
    Yes its that wish for you to think your short article over and over again and develop the finest you can think
    about. internet illinois marketing (Randell) Do invest
    at least 30 to 15 minutes for the title if you spend 1 hour (not that this is ideal) to write a short article.The distinction between general keywords and buyer
    keywords: This is golden and a vital to generate earnings from great keyword research.
    Purchaser keywords are words that when individuals type them into the search engines they are actively
    on the prowl to purchase something; they might actually have
    a credit card in their hand trying to find what
    they want.Your internet site or affiliate link ought to be
    able to make the sale for you. Many people do not enjoy
    the hard sell. Eventually it would be better for the reader not to click
    on your link today, then to have them unsubscribe.

  112. To put it merely, Empower Network is a blogging system with an integrated sales funnel.

    That may make sense to a few of you reading this, however if you’re not acquainted with these terms,
    I’ll discuss further.You need to then re-use this
    video footage to produce your very own DVD. Having your own DVD including recommendations makes an extremely good front final
    result. You can sell it to those you would like to end up being long term consumers
    for your work from house company. By appearing in the video you immediately discover as a
    real person, as opposed to a faceless corporation or business!So then exactly what’s
    the issue? The problem is that you like so many others new to
    Web marketing, are merely failing to comprehend the value of Search Engine
    Optimization. Sure there are countless potential brand-new customers or clients out there online.
    However at the exact same time you have failed
    to adequately take into consideration level of competition you’re up against.Some examples of business that utilise viral marketing
    in their online video advertising campaigns would be Audi, Nike, Coca Soda pop and most recently Old Spice.

    By now a lot of us have actually seen the hilarious Old Spice marketing in il (Toni) Campaigns about smelling like a man and not
    a lady!Talk Combination is a company that markets the concept of utilising video to deliver your message.

    What they actually are is a service company.
    They have actually done the screening and research study to establish
    a quality set of video devices for use by their clients. They also have
    a quality advertising and media staff to supply customized services.
    They’ve now stayed in business for numerous years and seem financially sound.
    Added to all of that their response time to their clients and partners
    is quite personable and very good.No doubt its only a one liner to
    put a title for the short article. However do spend a minimum of 25 % to 50 % of your time in creating
    a good impact title for the post. Yes its that long for you to believe your short article over and over once more and create the best you can think about.
    If you spend 1 hour (not that this is best) to compose a post internet marketing , then do
    invest at least 30 to 15 minutes for the title.When you could
    anticipate a bidding war on your piece of property,
    gone are the bubble days. Today, anticipate extreme bargaining
    and a lot of compromise. A domestic realty professional can help guide you
    through the process to assist you reach an affordable deal.
    So when you do set the price for your home, be gotten ready
    for it to drop considerably.Once again, picking up from
    the incorrect teachers will get you captured
    in a circle of failure! Make sure that you are learning from
    someone who has good credibility when it comes to finding out online advertising skills.

  113. Sabe, alguns homens mega babacas se entopem de
    Viagra unicamente com objetivo de transarem com número máximo de mulheres possíveis a fim de ganharem entre elas fama de bons de cama”
    ou então de ficarem penetrando uma mulher por horas a fio,
    literalmente a esfolando viva”, para que ela conte
    ás outras sobre sua grande virilidade” e proeza sexual,
    ou seja, motivo é meramente de alimentar próprio ego.

  114. La Afiliación Global es una de las peculiaridades innovadoras creadas ao longo
    de Hotmart en el mercado de Afiliados a fim de que aumentar las posibilidades com obtener
    ganancias y fortalecer aún más la relación con los productores a través a asociaciones essa
    grande plazo.

  115. Se você tem qualquer resultado que deseja vender (um sege, uma
    geladeira usada, um violão que não usa mais,
    Produtos Novos, Importados, Info Produtos, etc) Mercado Livre pode ser em direção a solução!

  116. Lee Towndrow: Fuertemente inspirado por el diseño, se
    pasó a la fotografía desde el planeta de las portadas de álbumes musicales.

  117. Este par de profesionales crean imágenes que se salen del patrón tradicional” de la
    fotografía de bodas.

  118. La noche nos permite jugar con muchas tonalidades como hemos podido ver pero en tanto que por el día por nuestro trabajo la vida cotidiana no podemos utilizar esta clase
    de tonos los toques exóticos sofisticados tienen perfecta cabida.

  119. It’s remarkable designed for me to have a web site, which is valuable
    designed for my knowledge. thanks admin

  120. I visited sevveral web sites Ьut thee audio quality fоr audio songs existing at tuis site іѕ actuaⅼly fabulous.

    Silahkan Kunjungi situs Sayya untuk mendapstkan Fakta lebih kereen menggenai blazer korea murah .

    Тhanks үa

  121. ӏ absolutеly love yoᥙr blog and find most of yοur post’s to bbe exactly I’m
    looking fⲟr. Ⅾo you offer guest writers tߋ write content to suit уour needs?
    I woսldn’t mind writing ɑ post оr elaboratjng on some of the subjects
    yоu ѡrite rеlated tօo here. Again, awesome weblog!

    Jaangan sungkan untuk mengunjungi halaman webb Saya hanya untuk mendapatkan Informasi lebih lengkap lagi tentang jas pengantin .
    Terima Kasih

  122. Great blog you have here but I was curious about if you knew
    of any message boards that cover the same topics talked about here?

    I’d really love to be a part of group where I can get responses from other experienced people that share
    the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know.
    Appreciate it!

  123. Ⅰf youu are going foг finest contentѕ likle I do, only
    pay а visit tһis website еverʏ dаʏ аs it ǥives qualitgy
    ϲontents, thanks

    Jangan lupa untu Kunjungi situs Saya unntuk dapat Info lebih lengkap lagi mengenai jasa backlifoto bugil terbarunk facebook .

    Тhanks ya

 Leave a Reply



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>